Comments for Unbounce

Comment on Google Panda for SEO Folks that Aren’t Bears (Infographic) by Thomas | Website Design & SEO, Durban

Thomas | Website Design & SEO, Durban — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:49:38 +0000

Now this is exactly what I have been looking for. Really easy to understand break down of the changes in Google’s algorithm. Thank you for sharing this!

Comment on 5 Businesses That Used A/B Tests to Lift Conversion Rates by up to 216% by Rachel Poling

Rachel Poling — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:44:42 +0000

This is great! I love seeing before & after, plus how much the conversion on each site improved. Thanks for pulling that all together!

Comment on 98 Content Marketing Articles to Make You an Insomniac by Ritika

Ritika — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:38:32 +0000

You’re welcome Eric! Thanks for the feedback.

Comment on 98 Content Marketing Articles to Make You an Insomniac by Ritika

Ritika — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:37:35 +0000

You’re very welcome, Oli! If the resource has been & will be helpful to people, then the work was well-worth the heavy lifting! Alex, definitely leave a note when you make it through to the end :).

Comment on 98 Content Marketing Articles to Make You an Insomniac by Eric

Eric — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:08:49 +0000

Great compilation! Thanks a million Ritika. That’s a lot to read, but, I believe, it’s worth my time.

Comment on Case Study: How I Created a Viral Ebook Landing Page – Using ThemeForest, PayWithATweet, KISSinsights and Unbounce by Rachel

Rachel — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:13:54 +0000

I’ve seen research that shows organic results get much better click-through rates; PPC got very little compared to the first 3-4 results on the page.

The difference was very significant, since PPC had a single digit (low numbers) click-through whereas the organic results
got the whopping majority of the click-throughs.

Also, videos rank much more easily, so maybe you should consider focusing on videos instead, and pushing those links.

Good luck.

Comment on Your Landing Page Sucks! Here are 10 Examples That Don’t… by Oli Gardner

Oli Gardner — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:48:23 +0000

Have to disagree. Video (TV etc.) is the most passive content consumption method there is – and as such requires the least effort to consume. And if it were only for B2B or purely business needs there wouldn’t be a million commercials on TV for consumers every day.

Whaddya think?

Comment on 5 Rockstar Landing Pages that Deserve a High-Five (or do they?) by Rachel

Rachel — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:48:05 +0000

I’ve noticed that nearly all landing pages are short and sweet, with plenty of white space, bulleted text, etc.

But do they really convert better than the long sales page (old-style) format? Because I’ve seen here and there that the latter have had better conversion rates in some markets.

Comment on Your Landing Page Sucks! Here are 10 Examples That Don’t… by Bieten Sie einen Gastzugang an als Shopbetreiber! Überdenken Sie Ihre interaktive Bühne auf Ihrer Homepage! Erhöhen Sie die Conversion Ihrer Landingapge durch Videoeinbindung! – Linktipps von Martin Beschnitt | usabilityblog

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:02:26 +0000

[...] 10 Landing Pages that are Crushing it with Video [...]

Comment on Your Landing Page Sucks! Here are 10 Examples That Don’t… by Deepa

Deepa — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:42:30 +0000

… sorry.. broke off in my last comment:

I’d rather read and let the attention-grabbing stuff grab my attention, than spend even 60 seconds (for which i’d first have to put my head phones on) engaged in an audio-visual. This is especially true if I’m a casual surfer searching for, say, “restaurants in xyz”, who then happens to land on my page. Video is probably for users with business needs….